“PLAYFULNESS” NOT ENDS WITH END OF “ADOLESCENCE”

“PLAYFULNESS”  NOT ENDS WITH END OF “ADOLESCENCE”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Adolescence period is for about 5 to 6 for human beings, for girls it ends at 16 & for boys it ends at 18, so adolescence starts for girls at 10 or 11 year of the age & ends at 16, for boys it begins at 12 or 13 & ends at 18.

So “16” is given so much of importance for girls in Indian myth.

But “childlikeness & playfulness” does not go with end of adolescence period; it remains even after end of adolescence, depending upon one’s nature & mental construction.

Playfulness can well remain in old age even, it’s a good sign & a very good behavioral pattern.

And one at childhood age & adolescence time can be abnormally serious & quiet like an old age person.

So it is an individual nature, dependent on person to person.

Any living being’s general nature is playfulness, not only that, also playfulness is must, it is absolutely necessary for a person of any age, yes at childhood this playfulness is more evident, there is more playing around, in groups it (playfulness) takes another form, that is in groups playfulness teaches us how to interact, how to live & act together.

Playfulness also takes another form with age, that is knowledge seeking, measured behavior & watchful steps are also part of the playfulness, which we learn right from playfulness & childhood curiosity.

So always be playful & encourage playfulness for a healthy life.

Subhro Das

Conceptualized 08/05/10, Written 05/11/11

(This is from my own experience & observation)

THE WINNER RACES IN HISTORY

THE  WINNER RACES  IN  HISTORY

---------------------------------------------------------------------.

This is my Thesis about the winners of history, as I deeply analyzed that, even if many races are far more advanced in civilization than others, they lost & succumbed to the inferiors races. I have come to this theory by analyzing Great Vedic & Egyptian civilizations, which succumbed many times over the period to other inferior civilizations & races in history.

WHY ?

The Analysis :

Kazakhstan (middle east) to Taklamakan to Xiahoe (West China), people were connected & were having almost same culture 3000 years ago, recent excavation of Taklamakan proves it. They were mainly “nomadic horsemen”, also reared small animals, did shifting & minor agriculture & were highly migratory, due to very hostile & deadly terrains.

That is, by analyzing series of rulers from Turks to Mongols to Tughlaks to Mughals to Hoons(Huns) to Tatars to Sakas, all of these were invader tribes & races & won lands after lands, civilization after civilization, which were far superior, subjugated these superior civilizations, ravaged them & settled there, BECAUSE they had  CARRIER ANIMALS, like horses, camels, donkeys.

Those races who had above carrier animals were either warriors or traders.

Horsemen, capable of using horse were warriors & other animal users (camels & donkeys) were generally traders.

HORSE WAS IN TOP.

Horsemen won the world.

Vedic civilization failed as reared cattle (cows, buffaloes, goats) only for food, milk & agriculture.

Also camels, donkeys, horses not necessarily need a cart for being used as self sufficient for uncarted use, but cows, buffaloes, bulls must need a cart, so the races using them while providing them with a great civilizations, but mainly for food, milk & agricultural cultivation use, these animals were capable of, but severely made them handicap to move, launch attack & win territories, also made them defenseless, i.e. unable to defend when horsemen came marauding on them, not only that, this made them poor traders & travelers, many will contradict by saying Vedic & Egyptian civilizations’ people were great traders & travelers, but actually neither they were great traders or travelers, barring a few ship voyages they went on, but that too when ship voyages began at much later stage in history.

Hence superior civilizations like Vedic & Egyptian kept losing to inferior & even to barbaric horse user tribesmen, there are many many examples of this throughout the world, right from Europe (Attila the Hoon) to Asia (Chengis Khan).

Therefore this thesis makes a radical difference in interpretation of history, along with a RADICAL difference of “mentalities of horse, camel and donkey USERS to the CATTLE REARS”, so it can be emphatically said type of animal use by a race set a “MENTALITY change & change in the COURSE of history”.

So, we can come to say type of animal use has a GREAT  IMPACT on the human civilization, so far not discussed in this perspective.

Subhro Das

Conceptualized 2/7/10, Written 6/10/11

(My theories & concepts

 I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them or point out if any flaw or deficiency in the same)

Subhro Das, India

CHANGE OF TITLE & ABOLITION OF CASTE SYSTEM

CHANGE OF TITLE & ABOLITION OF CASTE SYSTEM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------.

“Change of title”, not Abolition of TITLE will Eliminate CASTE SYSTEM.

Example :  Not Mohan Verma to Mohan Kumar as it is an Abolition, but Mohan Verma to Mohan Jha, Mohan Mandal to Mohan Kashyap, Mohan Ram to Mohan Singh, Mohan Pandey to Mohan Ram, Mohan Ram to Mohan Yadav, will change the Social Situation.

As I have seen many lower caste people having matching title of upper castes have been totally assimilated & accepted by upper caste society, as it blurs the rigid demarcation, Yes, such a proposal will be vehemently opposed by upper castes as their bastion will break down, also some lower castes will oppose as afraid of losing reservation benefits, but think that AIM of “reservation system” was solely abolition of caste system, not perpetuating it. So let us do it. This Title Change will create such haphazardness in the caste system that CASTE will lose meaning       :    Subhro Das  26/02/11

GROUP LIVING OF MAN: A COMPULSION

GROUP LIVING OF MAN: A COMPULSION

-------------------------------------------------------------.

Man lived with men in hoards in jungle(before civilization) unlike other animal groups, where alpha male drives away other males from the group, even kills the male child & only keeps hoards of females, but man due to compulsion has to keep up with other men in groups.

Reasons are, women are weak as per jungle criteria, not fit for hunting, bear children that immobilize them very much, breast feed the child, at periodical days in constraints, weight of bosoms hinder them & one man is incapable of hunting, so a group of men is needed to fell an animal for food, a man can’t feed a hoard women & their children(here promotion for nature’s cross breeding may not be a factor, as I analyzed a pack of lion family, also deer families).

Above all from beginning human were very hostile to other human groups, resorted to merciless butchering, once groups headed off each other, so for safety sake also, the compulsion of man had been to live with other men in a group.

Subhro Das

Conceptualized 10/04/11

Written 01/06/11